March 5, 2013
It's official: for the first time in school history, Gonzaga is the No. 1 team in the country.
51 of the 65 voters in the AP Poll put them there. So did 29 of the 31 voters in the Coaches Poll.
(CLICK HERE: To see both the AP and the Coaches top 25)
Does this mean that Gonzaga is the best team in the country? Of course not. If there's anything that we have learned this season, it's that there really isn't any single 'best' team. Indiana and Kansas and Duke and every other team in the top eight or nine right now is just as good as the Zags. Maybe better.
But as of today, that doesn't matter.
Because the way the polls work, if you lose, you drop. If you continue to win, you move up. It doesn't matter whether or not those wins are coming against Portland while those losses are coming of the road to Virginia or Maryland. That's part of the reason that, thankfully, top 25 rankings play absolutely no role in determining anything in our sport beyond what the little number is that shows up next to a team's name during broadcasts.
Here's the bottom-line: Gonzaga has as much of a right to the No. 1 ranking as anyone in the country right now, regardless of conference affiliation. They beat West Virginia by 34. They beat Oklahoma by 25 in the Old Spice Classic. They beat Kansas State — who just so happens to be in the top 10 — by 16. They beat Baylor by seven. They went into Stillwater and knocked off Oklahoma State. In other words, the Zags would be battling Kansas for Big 12 superiority if they were located in Shawnee, KS, instead of Spokane, WA.
Let's take it a step further: Gonzaga's two losses this season came when Brandon Paul lit them up for 36 points and when Roosevelt Jones made one of the most exciting and fluky plays of the season.
There shouldn't be any doubt that Gonzaga belongs in the conversation among the other national title contenders.
But what's intriguing about this team is that, even if they win the WCC tournament next week, there's a chance that they could end up falling off the No. 1 seed line in the NCAA tournament.
Only twice since 2000 has a No. 1 seed had a strength of schedule that was lower than Gonzaga's, which is currently 71st in the country. Both times it was Stanford, who had a schedule strength of 96th in 2004 and 82nd in 2000. There have only been three times where a No. 1 seed has come from outside the Power Six conferences, and all three times — Memphis in 2008, St. Joe's in 2004, and Cincinnati (then of Conference USA) in 2002 — had schedule strengths in the top 50.
(USA Today's Eric Prisbell did the legwork researching those numbers.)
This isn't entirely Gonzaga's fault, mind you. West Virginia was predicted to be a top 25 team and Baylor was thought to have a chance to crack the top 15. Washington State wasn't expected to finish at the bottom of the Pac-12, and it just so happens that BYU and St. Mary's are both a bit down this season. It happens to everyone, I know, but when you play in a mid-major conference and seven of your top ten opponents are worse than expected, it's going to sting.
There's only so much that the Zags are able to do, and in my mind, they've done enough to be ranked No. 1.
Because it's irrelevant.
What matters is where they are seeded, and whether or not they deserve a No. 1 seed is a different post for a different day.
You can find Rob on twitter @RobDauster.